Project management in a more traditional context refers to the practices provided by the Project Management Institute (PMI) through the PMBOK® Guide.
This document has a modus operandi for management action , but it does not follow what the agile methodology, Scrum, recommends.
The latter indicates that it is unnecessary to map the project from end to end or define all deliverables. For Scrum, changes will occur throughout the project, and there will be accelerations or delays. Therefore, if all the planning is done, this can get in the way and a lot of time is wasted.
The main benefit of Scrum is that it brings a sprint view , that is, it takes the work package individually. Returning to the house example, we can analyze the masonry part.
Thinking about a house with 10 rooms, 10 sprints are set up. This south korea whatsapp data allows the work package to be analyzed by subdivisions. For example : in the first 2 days the goal is to finish the first room.
It is clear, then, that Scrum breaks down work packages even further , which increases the team's productivity. When the step is executed, it is possible to have a method of efficiency analysis, calibrating, when necessary, the goal or the work of the collaborators.
This makes the project more efficient and adds value. However, keep in mind that it is possible to combine Scrum with traditional project management.
While the older model is based on documentation, the agile methodology foresees iteration, that is, practice. Therefore, the traditional schedule, for example, can be improved with Scrum, which opts for holding quick meetings to check for possible obstacles to completing the steps.
productivity.jpg
At the same time, Scrum works with Kanban, a board that details sprints and allows for more visual and uncomplicated management . In other words, you should take advantage of the best practices of traditional and agile methods. The result will be greater precision and accuracy in the processes carried out.