The Ethical Side of "Useful" Meters

[sadiksojib35]

Inflation is growing, and with it the cost of square meters. Buyers who yesterday could afford "comfort" class housing can today only count on "economy". Therefore, the product is being economically calibrated to meet the demands of the target audience.

Let's look at the issue from an ethical point uae telegram database of view. If a student needs space exclusively for sleeping, then according to the principle of "useful" meters, he needs space from 8 to 10 square meters. But what if the student has claustrophobia? How such housing will affect his psychological state is an open question.

If we leave aside possible psychological problems and look at it more broadly, the situation is the same. When a person buys a small apartment, there is less pleasure from it than when buying a spacious living space. Therefore, micro-housing is always a story about "necessity".

Business is the winner here. Developers have long taken note of the principle of "useful" meters and can sometimes overdo it. Every day, multi-story residential complexes appear on the outskirts of cities, which are popularly called "human anthills." Moreover, the area of ​​​​living in such houses can be even smaller than necessary. Some options are amazing. For example, offers of 10-12 square meters with a view of the same concrete box. Living in such an apartment will most likely be difficult.

On the topic. “Digital siege”: how threats to smart residential complexes are formed