Over time, the teachers realized that they were adhering to the methodology, but that this was not enough. They decided to ask themselves the important question: “Why are we doing this?” The answers to that why-question caused HAN to change a number of aspects of scrumming and to look more critically at the results. What were those changes?
The HAN no longer calls it Eduscrum, but simply 'learning'.
Teams are formed based on the same learning style and motivation rather than random teams.
Old-fashioned teaching is not a dirty word, the HAN still does it (just not for too long).
Receiving and giving feedback in every lesson is essential.
The roles of product owner and scrum master are preferably filled by 2 teachers, and pair teaching is currently being experimented with.
And most importantly: HAN is pushing for a growth mindset . Tell what your problem is, ask for help and finish what you start. It is precisely the effort that is appreciated, not so much the result. And if the student fails, he does not think "I can't do anything", but "I don't know everything about it yet, I have to do it differently next time." In this way, students are increasingly better prepared for the real world.
This story shows that education can certainly benefit from an agile way of teaching, but that it is also important to remain critical here. Why am I doing it? What do I want to achieve with it? And of course it takes some getting used to. For the teacher, who is used to teaching and helping the student plan. But certainly also for the student, who will feel very insecure if he or she suddenly has to think of everything themselves. So it is a careful process that you will have to embark on together.
I am always a bit critical when an exciting speaker new zealand number for whatsapp is invited who does not come from the profession. They tell a catchy story in a wonderful way, but the relevance and depth for the subject is limited. I sensed that reserve in several participants when Bjorn Kuipers, top referee and supermarket entrepreneur, entered the stage. He is directive, dominant and has a great deal of self-esteem, as evidenced by the minute-long video introduction of his successes as a referee.
What is agile about that? Nevertheless, I gradually became fascinated and thought-provoking by Kuipers' presentation. And the further match fragments – where the communication between the referee and his assistants was audible – became enormously relevant.
There has been a lot of innovation in the world of football recently. Think of the video referee, goal line technology and advanced communication possibilities. The team has also been expanded. Team Kuipers consists of 6 people for the Champions League, each team member pays attention to something specific. The game has become increasingly unpredictable and situational. This means that refereeing also requires agility and teamwork. Let's plot the agile values on team Kuipers:
Commitment
When everyone is giving 100 percent, it is felt in everything. The team prepares for a match, gives everything and evaluates extensively afterwards.