Requirements for procedural documents and annexes thereto
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2025 3:51 am
Today we do the same thing. We ask ChatGPT to review a person's LinkedIn profile so as not to explain what they are experts in and what professional language to use to speak to them. Then you give them the task of writing an official letter in a formal style in English. And two minutes later you receive this letter.
Conclusion
Gradually, many functions related to communication and management will be transferred to neural networks. And, perhaps, the day will come when entire companies will be managed at the operational level by artificial intelligence. But for now, you and I need to manage ourselves.
Many of the tools I listed you can and should be using right now. If you're not using special database them, you're wasting your time and money. It won't be long before AI-powered services will be able to create fully-fledged marketing campaigns, generate leads, and even do some pre-sales. I think they'll be just as good at it as humans.
All materials by the author
Requirements for procedural documents and annexes thereto that the participants in the case submit to the court
On July 4, 2023, the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, in the framework of case No. 233/4365/18 , proceedings No. 14-96ts21 (EDRSRU No. 112406155), examined the issue of requirements for procedural documents and annexes to them that the participants in the case submit to the court.
The procedural law stipulates that written evidence is documents (except electronic documents) that contain data on circumstances that are important for the correct resolution of the dispute. Written evidence is submitted in the original or in a duly certified copy, unless otherwise provided for by this Code. If only part of the document is important for the resolution of the dispute, a certified extract from it is submitted. Copies of documents are considered duly certified if they are certified in accordance with the procedure established by current legislation. A participant in the case who submits written evidence in copies (electronic copies) must indicate that he or another person has the original of the written evidence. A participant in the case confirms the correspondence of the copy of the written evidence to the original that is in his or her possession with his or her signature, indicating the date of such certification.
Conclusion
Gradually, many functions related to communication and management will be transferred to neural networks. And, perhaps, the day will come when entire companies will be managed at the operational level by artificial intelligence. But for now, you and I need to manage ourselves.
Many of the tools I listed you can and should be using right now. If you're not using special database them, you're wasting your time and money. It won't be long before AI-powered services will be able to create fully-fledged marketing campaigns, generate leads, and even do some pre-sales. I think they'll be just as good at it as humans.
All materials by the author
Requirements for procedural documents and annexes thereto that the participants in the case submit to the court
On July 4, 2023, the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court, in the framework of case No. 233/4365/18 , proceedings No. 14-96ts21 (EDRSRU No. 112406155), examined the issue of requirements for procedural documents and annexes to them that the participants in the case submit to the court.
The procedural law stipulates that written evidence is documents (except electronic documents) that contain data on circumstances that are important for the correct resolution of the dispute. Written evidence is submitted in the original or in a duly certified copy, unless otherwise provided for by this Code. If only part of the document is important for the resolution of the dispute, a certified extract from it is submitted. Copies of documents are considered duly certified if they are certified in accordance with the procedure established by current legislation. A participant in the case who submits written evidence in copies (electronic copies) must indicate that he or another person has the original of the written evidence. A participant in the case confirms the correspondence of the copy of the written evidence to the original that is in his or her possession with his or her signature, indicating the date of such certification.